Work-related stress in American trial judges.
نویسندگان
چکیده
This study examines work-related stress among American trial judges using a relational model of stress, which emphasizes an individual's appraisals in a person-situation relationship. A representative sample of 88 judges completed three questionnaires addressing type and magnitude of specific work-related stressors, psychological stress symptoms, and psychosocial moderators of stress. Factor analysis revealed five types of stressors: case, litigating party, purposes and consequences of decisions, conflicts between professional and personal values, and seriousness of a criminal offense. The most stressful aspects of work relate to poorly prepared or disrespectful counsel, exercising judicial management and discretion, and highly emotional cases under public scrutiny. Correlational analyses show that stress is associated with cognitive, emotional, and behavioral symptoms, including a possible adverse impact on decision-making capacity. Results are discussed in terms of the relational model of stress.
منابع مشابه
Evidence of secondary traumatic stress, safety concerns, and burnout among a homogeneous group of judges in a single jurisdiction.
Active judges are likely to face numerous work-related experiences (e.g., traumatic cases) that affect performance of their occupational duties. Three occupational experiences (secondary traumatic stress [STS], safety concerns, and burnout) are outlined and applied to the judiciary. Results from nine case study interviews conducted in a single jurisdiction among a homogeneous cohort suggest tha...
متن کاملA Comparative Study of the Requirement for Judges to Issue Alternative Submissions Arrangements for Interim Detention in Iran and France
Presence before the judges in criminal proceedings for preliminary investigations and the hearing process. Ensuring the rights of victims to compensate for losses and damages and preventing disruption in normal process of criminal proceedings by the defendant are two important purposes in issuing the writ in order to gain fair and equitable hearings. Todays, the use of alternatives to pre-trial...
متن کاملA pilot survey of trial court judges' opinions on pro se competence after Indiana v. Edwards.
In Indiana v. Edwards, the U.S. Supreme Court held that a higher standard may be required for pro se competence (PSC) than for competence to stand trial (CST). However, the Court refrained from elaborating a specific standard. The trial judge is in the best position to make more fine-tuned mental capacity decisions. This pilot study surveyed trial judges' opinions about PSC to help forensic eva...
متن کامل[Stress, anxiety and depression in magistrates from Lima, Peru].
OBJECTIVE To measure the general and work related stress, depression and anxiety in Magistrates (Judges and District Attorneys) of Lima Judicial District. MATERIAL AND METHODS We carried out a transversal and descriptive study. A population of 1137 magistrates from the Lima Jurisdictional District of the Judicial System, was randomly sampled by a strata representing every agency of the Judici...
متن کاملFundamental Principles Regarding the Guarantee of the Principle of Judicial Impartiality in the International System and the Law of Iranian Law
The principles of independence and impartiality of the Judiciary is one of the most important grounds to achieve a fair trial and to ensure the rights of citizens in the proceedings, the principles which are inevitable for the existence of a judiciary whit fair and equitable judges. These principles have recognized in the vast majority of domestic legal systems as well as international legal re...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- The Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
دوره 22 1 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1994